[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-project
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-project] call for agenda items -- council meeting 2021-05-09
From:       "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2021-05-03 15:48:17
Message-ID: 4445945.8hzESeGDPO () pinacolada
[Download RAW message or body]


Am Montag, 3. Mai 2021, 17:31:03 CEST schrieb Thomas Deutschmann:
> On 2021-05-03 17:04, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > Please don't go the "we are not responsible for anything" route,
> > that's the fastest way to obstruct any productivity.
> 
> Well, I don't know what we will discuss and what will be the
> outcome. But imagine we would all agree and send a request to
> foundation to stop spending AWS credits for X immediately.
> 
> Foundation has to reject this request by law because such a request
> must come from a natural person.

Seriously, if the council would send a polite and friendly request to 
the foundation, and the trustees would outright refuse it only for 
that formal reason, I would consider that hostile and unconstructive 
behavior. Law doesn't come in because the trustees themselves can 
introduce motions.

We should try to work together. 

If some of us don't do that, we need to find a better solution for 
Gentoo. That's why (following the ugly debates around Ian) I want a 
single elected body to be responsible.

-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]