[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-portage-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: EAPI 6
From:       Zac Medico <zmedico () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2020-03-14 21:30:15
Message-ID: fe6fa169-9d28-c9fb-a4a8-9fbebd43773b () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/mixed)]


On 3/14/20 1:40 PM, Samuel Bernardo wrote:
> Thank you very much Zac for your answers.
> 
> I was wondering if I was missing any coding convention after reading
> [1], since I always follow the pattern to define eclasses inside my
> overlays as needed, sometimes overriding those provided from gentoo
> portage. I was not sure if I was doing the development breaking the
> expected QA rules.
> 
> With your explanation I know now that I'm doing it the right way.
> 
> [1]
> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/appendices/common-problems/index.html#qa-notice----eclass-foo-inherited-illegally
> 

The stale cache issues that are mentioned there only applied to the
'pms' cache format which should not be used since around 2012/2013 when
we changed the default for the metadata/layout.conf cache-formats
setting here:

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=e760c8d2a4ccc56e351ac37904c715f596b58e42
                
-- 
Thanks,
Zac


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]