[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_=5Bgentoo-dev=5D_Can_app-office/sc_be_?= =?US-ASCII?Q?replaced_by_app-office/sc-i
From:       Andrew Ammerlaan <andrewammerlaan () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2022-06-28 4:46:04
Message-ID: 0AAFF232-EE1D-41F5-BB83-62EDD3915E15 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]



On June 28, 2022 1:37:19 AM GMT+02:00, Dex Conner <cantcuckthis@danwin1210.de> wrote:
>On 22/06/27 10:59AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 11:24 PM Jeff Gazso <jeff.gazso@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > My thought is unless some serious deficiency is present in
>> > app-office/sc-im it should be moved to Gentoo's main ebuild repository
>> > and the last rites process should be started for app-office/sc. Does
>> > anyone else have thoughts or comments on this?
>> 
>> We could probably last rite app-office/sc. It has no maintainer, and a
>> couple of open bugs.
>> 
>> Moving app-office/sc-im to the Gentoo repo is a bit more of an ask.
>> Ideally, a Gentoo developer would maintain it. Alternatively, a
>> non-developer could maintain it by proxy, but you would need to find a
>> developer to act as proxy or get approval from the Proxy Maintainers
>> project. In any case, you should probably reach out to the current
>> maintainer in GURU to see what he wants to do.
>> 
>
>I'm the maintainer of app-office/sc-im. Just so everyone is aware, upon 
>talking to Jeff, I've decided to maintain it by proxy. I have some reading 
>to do but hopefully I'll have created the necessary pull requests by 
>tomorrow.
>
>I do have just one question: Should I wait until the pull requests are 
>merged to remove sc-im from GURU or should I do it after I create the pull 
>requests?

Please remove it only after merging, this creates a seemless transition for the users of this package.

Best regards
Andrew

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]