[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Can app-office/sc be replaced by app-office/sc-im from GURU?
From:       Dex Conner <cantcuckthis () danwin1210 ! de>
Date:       2022-06-27 23:37:19
Message-ID: 20220627233719.akgp4evx6q2lsy2e () localhost
[Download RAW message or body]


On 22/06/27 10:59AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 11:24 PM Jeff Gazso <jeff.gazso@gmail.com> wrote:
> > My thought is unless some serious deficiency is present in
> > app-office/sc-im it should be moved to Gentoo's main ebuild repository
> > and the last rites process should be started for app-office/sc. Does
> > anyone else have thoughts or comments on this?
> 
> We could probably last rite app-office/sc. It has no maintainer, and a
> couple of open bugs.
> 
> Moving app-office/sc-im to the Gentoo repo is a bit more of an ask.
> Ideally, a Gentoo developer would maintain it. Alternatively, a
> non-developer could maintain it by proxy, but you would need to find a
> developer to act as proxy or get approval from the Proxy Maintainers
> project. In any case, you should probably reach out to the current
> maintainer in GURU to see what he wants to do.
> 

I'm the maintainer of app-office/sc-im. Just so everyone is aware, upon 
talking to Jeff, I've decided to maintain it by proxy. I have some reading 
to do but hopefully I'll have created the necessary pull requests by 
tomorrow.

I do have just one question: Should I wait until the pull requests are 
merged to remove sc-im from GURU or should I do it after I create the pull 
requests?

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]