[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] sys-apps/portage: add support for recognizing LoongArch ABIs
From:       WANG Xuerui <xen0n () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2022-04-24 18:03:19
Message-ID: 5c6033e9-609c-75de-fbbd-ef8cfdff84fc () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/mixed)]

[Attachment #4 (multipart/mixed)]

[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

Hi,

On 4/25/22 01:57, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-04-24 at 23:21 +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <xen0n@gentoo.org>
>> ---
>>   .../portage/files/3.0.30-loong-abis.patch     | 133 +++++++++
>>
> Why add a patch when we can make a new Portage release with this?

I saw many other changes on the main branch, and some revert patches for 
the 3.0.30 versions, so I figured it's somewhat risky for a new release, 
and just upstreamed the bits well-tested since December last year.

That said, I'm not deeply familiar with the Portage codebase, and 
committed this only after getting sam's ACK. So would some other portage 
devs give opinions re whether to just make a new release?

-- 
WANG Xuerui
xen0n@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
PGP: 7C52 19E3 26A0 7311 3EA3 8806 C01F 7214 BC93 1414


["OpenPGP_0xC01F7214BC931414.asc" (application/pgp-keys)]
["OpenPGP_signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]