[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Clang/LLVM profile
From:       "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2021-11-29 13:35:39
Message-ID: 2101725.7aMVyhfb16 () noumea
[Download RAW message or body]


> Honestly, I think this is pretty on-topic for gentoo-dev given a lot of us
> are quite interested in this.
^ this

> - I'm not sure why you would need virtual/toolchain or virtual/binutils
> unless it's just for usage within bootstrapping scripts? Seems more like
> you could just remove gcc from @system and such?
^ this too

FWIW, a minimal chroot (corresponding to a stage3) rebuilds quite nicely with 
clang, with one exception (sys-libs/glibc obviously).

Being able to build glibc with clang is seen as a desirable long-term goal by 
glibc upstream, seems to be nontrivial to implement though.

-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer 
(council, qa, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]