[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage QA check for FHS/Gentoo policy paths, for top-level dirs and /usr/shar
From:       Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2019-01-27 13:58:34
Message-ID: 59565022.tOID2UdrHk () tuxk10
[Download RAW message or body]

On Montag, 1. Oktober 2018 20:16:28 CET Michał Górny wrote:
> >  It is a problem because any other package
> > building QCH API docs with cross-references to Qt API needs to install
> > below this path, and will generate the same QA warning (currently
> > kde-frameworks/* does this).
> 
> Yes.  That is why I believe that hardcoding the exception in every
> package is simply wrong.  Wouldn't it be cleaner to account for the path
> in the QA check?

What's the current status of this? I'd like to know if there's going to be a 
whitelist or QA_ var to put into kde5.eclass, if not, I can also simply 
(EAPI-7-)move kde handbook directory out of /usr/share/doc into /usr/share/
kde-doc or similar and be done with it.

Regards,
Andreas




[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]