[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-dev] Re: netsurf Prefix breakage
From:       Benda Xu <heroxbd () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2018-11-26 14:10:52
Message-ID: 87y39ghqtv.fsf () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


OK Virgil,

Virgil Dupras <vdupras@gentoo.org> writes:

> Discussing this change on the list? I haven't touched the eclass, I
> simply fixed the xmw-abandoned netsurf package which had been broken for
> 3 months prior to that (and by broken, I don't mean only on Prefix. Why
> talk about 1-1 features in those situations?). Fixing packages without
> touching eclasses doesn't require gentoo-dev review.
>
> Also, netsurf doesn't have any prefix keyword. Some of the lower-level
> libs have ~m68k-mint, but it isn't clear why because the only
> non-netsurf revdep to those libs is net-libs/libwebsockets and it isn't
> keyworded for prefix either.
>
> Please, open a ticket on the appropriate package with a description
> of an actual breakage and I'll be deligthed to address it.

Well, all in all, thank you for stepping up to take care of
netsurf-buildsystem.  You're good.

Yours,
Benda

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]