[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Repoman to warn about suspicious =-dependencies
From:       Dirkjan Ochtman <djc () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2018-03-26 9:33:45
Message-ID: CAKmKYaD2AuMqeXd64Z00KpvmjxNj3rqwpBFSkL7XuckjGPgBow () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny@gentoo.org>=
 wrote:

> I think this cause the trouble of specifying '-r0' rather rarely, and it
> will decrease the number of mistakes, also effectively making Gentoo
> development easier. It is somewhat inspired by the handling of slot
> operators (where repoman explicitly asks you to use ':*' instead
> of no operator when the latter would be ambiguous).
>
> What do you think?
>

Sounds good!

Regards,

Dirkjan

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr">On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Michał Górny <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:mgorny@gentoo.org" target="_blank">mgorny@gentoo.org</a>&gt;</span> \
wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">I think this cause the trouble of specifying &#39;-r0&#39; \
rather rarely, and it<br> will decrease the number of mistakes, also effectively \
making Gentoo<br> development easier. It is somewhat inspired by the handling of \
slot<br> operators (where repoman explicitly asks you to use &#39;:*&#39; instead<br>
of no operator when the latter would be ambiguous).<br>
<br>
What do you think?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Sounds \
good!</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Dirkjan<br></div></div></div></div>




[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]