[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Its time to mask sys-libs/uclibc
From:       "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2018-02-23 16:25:57
Message-ID: bdf5afa6-6fa8-1eb7-a495-e6fae665fe3d () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 2/23/18 11:22 AM, Matthias Maier wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018, at 10:01 CST, "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
>> [...]
> 
>> I'm not even sure a news item is needed here.  What do people think?  If
>> you think so, who do I even direct it at?
> 
> If there is no action needed on user side and an upgrade and migration
> from uclibc to uclibc-ng happens automatically, I'd say no news item is
> necessary.
> 
> Further, seeing "uclibc-ng" being emerged and "uclibc" unmerged should
> be pretty self explanatory.
> 
> Best,
> Matthias
> 

I already sent a news item for migrating uclibc -> uclibc-ng some years
ago.  After 6 years, anyone still on uclibc has a seriously broken
system.  I doubt migration is even possible at this point.

-- 
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail    : blueness@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP  : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB  DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID  : F52D4BBA

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]