[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving OpenRC to a meson-based build
From:       Austin English <wizardedit () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2017-02-03 0:10:22
Message-ID: 59647773-b7f3-072b-8d15-3449a1b7fed8 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/mixed)]


On 02/01/2017 08:53 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 01/02/17 09:43 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 01:18:42PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> W dniu 30.01.2017, pon o godzinie 14∶04 -0600, użytkownik William Hubbs
>>> napisał:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> I have been looking at the meson build system [1] [2], and I like
>>>> what I
>>>> see.
>>>>
>>>> I have opened an issue on OpenRC's github wrt migrating OpenRC to the
>>>> meson build system [3].
>>>>
>>>> As I said on the bug, the downside is the addition of py3 and ninja
>>>> as
>>>> build time dependencies, but I think the upside (a build system where
>>>> we don't have to worry about parallel make issues or portability)
>>>> outweighs that.
>>>>
>>>> What do folks think here?
>>>
>>> On behalf of systemd team, I would like to officially contradict any
>>> rumors that those ideas are in any way caused by systemd team. OpenRC
>>> developers are shooting their own feet of their own choice.
>>
>> I don't even know what this is about. I have said nothing about systemd
>> or any other package like that.
>>
> 
> Pre-emptive strike is all.  We all know systemd gets blamed for
> everything. :D

My bathtub drains too fast, making it hard to take a bath instead of a
shower.

Freaking systemd.. ;)

-- 
-Austin

Austin English
Gentoo Developer
GPG: 00B3 2957 B94B F3E1


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]