[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] depend.apache.eclass and EAPI=6
From:       Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2016-09-30 22:48:52
Message-ID: f0b930ac-3e3b-3f63-f75c-afbe69668229 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/mixed)]


On 10/01/2016 12:45 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016, 00:12:26 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand:
>> On 10/01/2016 12:09 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>> Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016, 00:01:54 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand:
>>>>> This *will* break the following ebuilds:
>>>>>
>>>>> www-apps/bugzilla-4.4.12
>>>>> www-apps/bugzilla-5.0.3
>>>>> www-apache/mod_limitipconn-0.24-r2
>>>>> www-apache/mod_nss-1.0.12-r1
>>>>> app-eselect/eselect-php-0.9.1
>>>>> net-analyzer/pnp4nagios-0.6.25-r3
>>>>> net-analyzer/icinga2-2.4.10-r1
>>>>
>>>> Several of these ebuilds are in stable, so I strongly oppose any action
>>>> that breaks existing ebuilds.
>>>
>>> Right. So instead I'll ad a big fat and ugly ewarn message, but I'll do
>>> that right now. :)
> 
>> As its not user-breaking/affecting, I believe ewarn is wrong as well.
>> Should just open bug reports towards the affected packages with a tracker
> 
> I agree that what we really need here is eqawarn ...
> 
> However I *want* the message to be loud and obnoxious.
> We need  eblinkwarn ... :o)
>

I don't see why users should be bothered with maintainer mistakes that
doesn't affect them (in this particular circumstance)


-- 
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]