[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] questions about small fixes/cleanups
From:       Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2016-09-19 10:06:28
Message-ID: 6189a1e1-b154-2f49-585b-ecf0be6bcbd1 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/mixed)]


On 09/19/2016 10:00 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Kristian Fiskerstrand schrieb:
>>> Why are those ebuilds not live? If upstream doesn't do real releases and
>>> can't even be bothered to tag the commit that marks a release, then why
>>> are you (or someone else) doing all this work? The snapshot scripts
>>> could be replaced by a live ebuild and upstream can handle bugs as they
>>> come since they can't be bothered to version their software.
>>
>> I would expect because live ebuilds can't be keyworded, so snapshot is
>> the correct way to do it.
> 
> I think the rule of not keywording live ebuilds originally applied only
> to those who fetch git/svn/cvs head.
> If a live ebuild fetches a particular revision, then the disadvantage is
> still that it can't be mirrored (hence a snapshot is preferable from
> user POV), but other than that it can be tested fine.

Or a release CD / any offline system, or verifying OpenPGP signature of
the distributed tarball, or...


-- 
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]