[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree
From:       Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2016-08-15 14:50:38
Message-ID: f837bc61-08a8-4606-9a0b-6018cba421f1 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/mixed)]


On 08/15/2016 04:49 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 08/15/2016 04:19 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> I'm very much for this as well. Themaintainer should be able to
>> stabilize on all arches after the timeout. That would solve the primary
>> concern I have about the stable tree lagging.
> 
> It depends on the context, if it is not security related or fixing a
> known bug, it can cause regression for stable users without much gain.
> 

Elaborating on this, if we're talking about maintainer stabilizing it
after testing it properly there is no issue, but there shouldn't be a
policy to auto-mark stable

-- 
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]