[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ban EAPI 1
From:       Alexis Ballier <aballier () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2015-06-11 19:26:48
Message-ID: 20150611212648.37d4b246 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:15:42 -0400
Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:38:35 -0400
> > Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> These errors are not user-visible. I really don't have a problem
> >> with repoman errors for deprecated features.
> >>
> >
> > I don't have a problem with always using --force either. But then
> > the distinction between warnings and errors becomes much less clear.
> >
> 
> In general I'd tend to agree, but we're talking about a very limited
> pool of 70 packages, whose maintainers should always be aware of the
> issue, and the number of affected packages should constantly decline.
> 
> If we were talking about something that wasn't on its way out I'd be
> more concerned.
> 

When will it be out?

From previous ocaml stabilizations, I'd say that I'll have to use
--force for at least two months before it can be removed. I might get
bored and alias --force :)

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]