[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gentoo-dev
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to "full multilib"
From: Davide Pesavento <pesa () gentoo ! org>
Date: 2015-03-30 1:32:17
Message-ID: CADfzvvb0e2oNb7Pk7sHVzD8xqaP+q4Qd2AmS=ojqMzUDwMxpPw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Davide Pesavento <pesa@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>>> qt is a pretty significant package to have break with multilib, and
>>> trying to run qt-5 on a stable system is already a nightmare with the
>>> qtchooser switch (in my case I ended up abandoning qt5 as I didn't
>>> need it that badly).
>>
>> I'm not sure how qt5 is relevant to this discussion.
>>
>
> As I understand it, qt5 cannot be installed side-by-side with the
> current stable qt4, but it can be installed side-by-side with 4.8.6.
> My understanding is that this is the result of the same overall
> ebuild/eclass changes. Therefore, it is another reason to stabilize
> 4.8.6. You are correct that it has nothing to do with the multilib
> changes otherwise.
>
Your understanding is correct, and I agree it is indeed another reason
to stabilize 4.8.6. Thanks for clarifying.
Regards,
Davide
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic