[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted
From:       Sebastian Pipping <sping () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2015-03-27 0:31:29
Message-ID: 5514A4E1.30903 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 15.03.2015 10:48, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to 
>> consider moving other repositories there -- at least the
>> official ones. Of course, it would be a nice result, having
>> everything hosted on git.g.o as git.g.o/repo/${repo_name}.git.
> 
> Isn't "repo" fairly redundant? Everything there is a repository.

There are Git repositories that do not contain ebuilds up there.  So
"repo" is not redundant if it refers to its "overlays" kind of meaning.

Two examples:

  http://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage-utils.git/
  http://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/userinfo-scripts.git/

Best,



Sebastian

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]