[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-dev] =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtnZW50b28tZGV2XSBSZTogW2dlbnRvby1kZXZdIFJlOiBbZ2VudG9vLWRldl0gUg==?= =?
From:       Rich Freeman <rich0 () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2014-12-21 16:39:20
Message-ID: CAGfcS_ndz1c+Mm1imcKZhe3=4O+ALBYws=0jSD-0CY-kt=a=kw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:40 AM, William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote=
:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 03:15:48PM +0300, =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=
=D0=B9 wrote:
>> Today two bugs from 504116's dependencies were resolved and two other
>> bugs were removed from 504116's dependencies list. Thanks to
>> maintainers who decided to solve the problem!
>
> The bugs being resolved is good, but I'm concerned about the bugs that
> were *removed* from the dependencies list.
>
> Why were they removed rather than being resolved?
>

See mgorny's comment in the bug:
Removing bugs for maintainer-use scripts. We need not to care about those.

--
Rich

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic