[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Duplicate bug reports, resolution status and Bug 426262
From:       Peter Stuge <peter () stuge ! se>
Date:       2014-11-29 14:51:45
Message-ID: 20141129145145.11120.qmail () stuge ! se
[Download RAW message or body]

Michael Mol wrote:
> 4) Jer marked #530478 as a dupe of #426262,

To me that looks bogus. #530478 is about app-office/dia while #426262
is about two eclasses.

Jeroen - please explain why you consider 530478 a duplicate of 426262?

I note that you did not do so in Bugzilla while marking the dupe, but
I think an explanation is very much warranted in this case.

I would have understood if you simply noted that 530478 was *related*
to 426262, but duplicate has a distinct and very different meaning. Right?

And please see if you can adopt a better tone. Your tone in

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530478#c4

sounds quite nasty for no apparent reason. :\


//Peter

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]