[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of dohtml
From:       Samuli Suominen <ssuominen () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2014-08-28 16:03:16
Message-ID: 53FF52C4.5010800 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


On 28/08/14 18:58, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-08-28, o godz. 00:37:48
> Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
>
>> 3. ulm wants to reintroduce dohtml in an eclass for people who want to
>> use it. I'd rather cover it with warnings signs and tell people not to
>> touch it. IMHO a better replacement is the plain 'docinto html; dodoc
>> -r ...', possibly with some extra filtering applied before or after
>> install.
>>
>> What do you think?
> One more thing came up on IRC: einstalldocs (and therefore the default
> install function) installing README* that catches README.html as well.
> I'd rather not add more dohtml-like magic and say it's fine.

I really dislike the whole default list of files defined for DOCS, I keep
constantly adding empty DOCS="" to ebuilds to skip them
I'd rather see whole list pruned empty, and let the maintainer
decide which docs are actually useful

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]