[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps
From:       Jan Matejka <yac () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2014-08-27 16:18:58
Message-ID: 20140827181858.2f9fed59 () carolyn
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:05:32 +0200
Tom Wijsman <TomWij@gentoo.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:41:39 -0400
> Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > I wonder if there may be some form of extension we could add to
> > portage, such that it could do a VDB-only "re-emerge" somehow, when
> > the in-tree ebuild doesn't match the in-VDB one.  If that could be
> > implemented properly (and i'm not sure that it could, tbh), maybe
> > that would help reduce issues with dynamic deps, too...
> 
> Hmm, dynamic dependencies ... dynamic rebuilds ... dynamic
> compilation; one day we will have hot code pushes where upstream
> changes immediately reflects itself upon one's system. Does such a
> gimmick succeed? Meteor!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KGraft

- --
Jan Matějka        | Developer
https://gentoo.org | Gentoo Linux
GPG: A33E F5BC A9F6 DAFD 2021  6FB6 3EBF D45B EEB6 CA8B
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJT/gT1AAoJEIN+7RD5ejahISgIAKbVgqLmuJADmJ37TddtmPPP
7WPq5UYdGT4wq9rElrU3GCu10u+pxQqOOKzVjnXiSlcCF1xqkG07caaYO/Xw/ccS
VclMPDngRU7YUSl9F6UeDkDK9l+48qE/1/ohrSL9f8giA5H5SZ3G3fanWN/oFp6W
FsGx7J6ddRmM/LaSHrso4ngbMU7XIMFZgUeR5X3t5bWef/Si9adxJzfbMoCQFUDN
7qXT8EkY9U9Po5/aAqtsriyGWZttuIvjGbmiNdrdJI/IT/Rshlqzqy/viqcK2aOX
bCO1dn5wRLxfV7JBgmg14UJqcDK6HgkSkl4rrl574M4arq7kZtbMEKbSvDcpurw=
=Wphr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]