[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights
From:       Tom Wijsman <TomWij () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2014-01-22 23:40:04
Message-ID: 20140123004004.5c0fc7df () TOMWIJ-GENTOO
[Download RAW message or body]


On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:42:14 -0500
Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:

> So, this was what I was trying to get at in my email.  I see a couple
> of different models being thrown around and they really differ on the
> guidelines as to how QA would apply the power to suspend devs.

Looking at the rest of your mail besides this; I think that what needs
to be discussed further is which cases would be a ComRel matter and
which cases would not be.

There are some loosely defined borders we know of ("technical",
"personal", "CoC violation", "breakage", ...) but when it comes to
matters that lie on the borders of the above or there are combinations
possible, I think we have some situations where both solutions may be
possible, maybe we should try to work these out a bit further. 

As when we would wait till it happens and then start to discuss whose
matter this is, it would form a problem as well as a delay.

-- 
With kind regards,

Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer

E-mail address  : TomWij@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key  : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2  ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]