[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC
From:       Duncan <1i5t5.duncan () cox ! net>
Date:       2013-12-14 12:47:47
Message-ID: pan$92a69$819486e$f3c278cf$c228954a () cox ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

William Hubbs posted on Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:03:57 -0600 as excerpted:

> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 07:53:59PM +0000, Duncan wrote:
>> William Hubbs posted on Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:23:07 -0600 as excerpted:
>> 
>>>  There are reasons to run the rc binary directly; this is how you
>>>  should be changing runlevels.
>> 
>> ???
>> 
>> init 9 (or telinit 9, yes, I have a runlevel 9, basic, just gpm as it
>> happens) isn't appropriate?
> 
> Well, I have to qualify what I said.
> 
> There are two "runlevels" you have to worry about.
> The OpenRC runlevels are named; you can switch between these using rc
> directly, for example:
> 
> rc default
> rc single
> rc nonetwork
> 
> The sysvinit runlevels are the numbered ones, and these are mapped to
> things to run, like 3 is mapped to /sbin/rc default. I believe runlevel
> 3 is mapped to other things in inittab, so, I guess the best answer is,
> it depends on what you are wanting to change. Does that make sense?

Yes, it does.  Thanks.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]