[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-dev] Re: How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function?
From:       Ryan Hill <dirtyepic () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2013-04-30 4:56:33
Message-ID: 20130429225633.425c6656 () caribou ! gateway ! 2wire ! net
[Download RAW message or body]


On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:36:07 +0200
Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:14:37 +0200
> Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > Therefore, I ask you: how should we name the new (and simpler) patch
> > applying function which will be provided in EAPI 6?
> 
> My propositions:
> 
> - apply_patches ...
> - apply_user_patches
> 
> Where I think we used the latter name when discussing adding user patch
> support.

blech too long, underscores.  how about dopatch?

if at all possible, please keep EPATCH_EXCLUDE around.  it's just too damned
useful.


-- 
gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets
@ gentoo.org

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]