[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Useflags: xsl vs xslt
From:       Rich Freeman <rich0 () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2013-04-29 11:11:59
Message-ID: CAGfcS_mLgJXJUis7nJjGkFtv-S8YBtnfsDu8v=0r68BDdpWdcA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:12:05 +0200
> Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se> wrote:
>
>> Diego Elio Petten=F2 wrote:
>> > The correct one should be xslt and that's it..
>>
>> Can you please motivate your opinion? Saying "that's it" is quite hostil=
e.
>
> Terse maybe.  Blunt.  Hostile?  No.

Maybe not hostile, but it certainly is blunt, and it basically has an
implied "because I said so."

Nobody learns from a blunt answer.  Potentially people learn from one
that has a one-sentence rationale, even if it is just "for the reasons
already stated."  However, that is better accomplished by just ++'ing
the previous post.

Rich

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]