[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC
From:       Michael Mol <mikemol () gmail ! com>
Date:       2013-04-26 11:20:39
Message-ID: CA+czFiBWfT7HXiEYn_YfTBeqj7dfiUaw+J6jwf=bBrTP8kH-QQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Apr 26, 2013 4:59 AM, "Tobias Klausmann" <klausman@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> > I'm still not quite sure what newnet does that oldnet doesn't, or
> > why somebody felt it was necessary to make a new package (and no,
> > let's not discuss that here). Whatever it is, ideally, it would
> > reflected in the name(s). And package descriptions.
>
> Scratch that. After reading Rob's post, I know. TYVM.

I must have missed that. What post?

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Apr 26, 2013 4:59 AM, &quot;Tobias Klausmann&quot; &lt;<a \
href="mailto:klausman@gentoo.org">klausman@gentoo.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br> &gt;<br>
&gt; Hi!<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Tobias Klausmann wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; I&#39;m still not quite sure what newnet does that oldnet doesn&#39;t, \
or<br> &gt; &gt; why somebody felt it was necessary to make a new package (and \
no,<br> &gt; &gt; let&#39;s not discuss that here). Whatever it is, ideally, it \
would<br> &gt; &gt; reflected in the name(s). And package descriptions.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Scratch that. After reading Rob&#39;s post, I know. TYVM.<br></p>
<p dir="ltr">I must have missed that. What post?<br>
</p>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]