[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC
From:       Ian Stakenvicius <axs () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2013-04-25 1:39:22
Message-ID: 5178894A.9060506 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 24/04/13 09:10 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 07:32:44PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
> wrote:
>> On 04/24/2013 07:17 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> 
>>> This would actually be cleaner than a bogus dependency in
>>> OpenRC. I would probably call it virtual/network-manager
>>> though.
>>> 
>> You can't call it virtual/network-manager, that calls to mind,
>> you know, net-misc/networkmanager.  That's just too confusing
>> imho.  I wouldn't object to virtual/net, or pretty much anything
>> else that isn't confusing.  The net scripts are not a network
>> manager, networkmanager, wicd, even wpa_supplicant would be
>> things I would consider to be network managers.
> 
> But the oldnet scripts do run wpa_supplicant, dhcp clients, etc,
> for each interface they manage.
> 
> Newnet doesn't even try that, it just manages static interfaces
> and assumes that you will use a dhcp client or something like
> wpa_supplicant in standalone mode to control your interfaces.
> 

virtual/network-init  ?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlF4iUoACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCvSAEAgSXxzswzYmOfJGl27vtb4C4w
1RjxSoLzAIAl1htEmr4A/3q3QIghpzNlG0Fmawu3eR8ML6BRf+HWwJplIWhvM6F8
=BHp8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]