[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge --depclean vs missing IUSE in older ebuild.. what exactly is right?
From:       Zac Medico <zmedico () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2012-12-31 23:55:31
Message-ID: 50E225F3.3090505 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 12/31/2012 07:22 AM, Leho Kraav wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> 
> Just bumped into something I haven't encountered before. Running amd64.
> 
> Already had sys-auth/pambase-20101024-r2 (stable) installed. Then
> installed gnome-base/gdm-3.4.1-r3 binpkg, binhost had newer pambase,
> which is why this didn't surface before.
> 
> Everything is fine for runtime, but emerge --depclean pukes with
> "sys-auth/pambase[consolekit] is not installed". Looking at this from
> all angles, this condition *is* most certainly fulfilled.
> 
> Trying to re-emerge gdm from source revealed that only
> > =pambase-20120417 seems to fulfill its requirements. Initially I
> couldn't figure out why.
> 
> Poking around in gdm-3.4.1-r3.ebuild L56 reveals [1]:
> 
> sys-auth/pambase[consolekit?,systemd?]
> 

I've fixed the --depclean output to display the unevaluated atom in this
case:

http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=925eadd210dbc3802000d92f458ae7029832273e


-- 
Thanks,
Zac


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]