[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: Questions about proxy-maint (Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers)
From:       Markos Chandras <hwoarang () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2012-12-26 23:06:50
Message-ID: CAG2jQ8iYuFnpCo_mKQWPSYJwEv0Gj3eVkaYZMfqvgeSrz8iAzA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 26 December 2012 20:43, Kent Fredric <kentfredric@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27 December 2012 05:39, Kent Fredric <kentfredric@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It could actually be just the Proxy Maintainer workflow is not clear enough,
>> or simple enough, and that we need more push towards a more heavy
>> proxy-maintainer based system ( I don't know, I'm ignorant to too much of
>> proxy-maintainer-ship stuff,  to discern /why/ that is might be difficult,
>> but I'd imagine my ignorance is part of the problem )
>
> Ok, after a bit of twitter, it seems part of my problem is I am just
> more comfortable, at least, in an initial recruitment scenario,
> working in a semi-proxy maintainer scenario.
>
> I like having other people review changes and soforth, and I like
> having a layer of protection between me and fuckery, and going from 0
> to "Can cause damage to CVS" is not something I'm fond of.
>
> And possibly, I can be helpful via the proxy maintainership avenue,
> and maybe more traffic going that way could be helpful.
>
> However, I note a problem of sorts:
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/  => http://i.imgur.com/o0BqO.png

Saw this thread too late. This is now bug 448710

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448710

-- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]