[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: review required by herd? (new ebuild)
From:       hasufell <hasufell () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2012-05-26 12:32:09
Message-ID: 4FC0CD49.5060007 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/26/2012 01:40 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Perhaps, but in general devs should be fairly free to add new
> packages to the tree as long as they properly maintain them.  If a
> dev makes a mistake with a newly-added package, then file a bug and
> they can fix it.  If there is a dispute over whether something is a
> bug then we have QA/Devrel/council/etc.

That's what I thought.

To be clear: I'm not suggesting that people don't work together.

But my point of view was rather that I have to go strictly by the
projects/herds rules if I want them to be involved in maintenance.
If not then it's my own fault IF it breaks things and I may be
punished for that.

I'm totally clear that I need to contact the herd when I add it to
metadata.xml, but that was not the question.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPwM1JAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz7SQH/0+nkqxS5R/gc1Kw/b2gTy6m
PuuSV8ooZTBJhZw8ezdZ8w0qjca3uhm/vo4Z2j8RournKWaBKYq485KJnDAj6Oh5
Toa1ap6/+LvzLxrokxE7RC2vSbto2gkwY7nzy3uYAxrECblupQ7dhXmI6mWIyKcr
33g3YnwilkeIkz86Foj8drPWJby/iHrhccy9i/NDtsXsDNhiPOdikms7MMCwruzI
dViy0YPWdieSh8FAfUewTs5sTpuM4qjht+sCaZMo/87VmLQWKMW1qWf9Blz+rKhw
U/q5bLN/jr5b8hijPtCeQyFVnH+a9K6SHFf1+N+rcuJNYceY7NaBu3izwLeBxWY=
=7unU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]