[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] doubtful about libjpeg-turbo vs. libjpeg binary compatibility
From:       "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2012-01-30 8:25:11
Message-ID: 4F2653E7.4050803 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


On 1/19/12 6:42 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> a) changing the virtual/jpeg dependency to>=libjpeg-turbo-...
> 
> will be done soon as 1.2.0 is released and stabilized, i'd like to skip
> 1.1.90

Sounds good to me.

> a) is fine, preventing any downgrades.   a fatal check, like glibc and
> qt4 has to prevent downgrading is an option too, but a bit overkill imho

Agreed, in my opinion such a check would be a bad idea. People might
have reasons to temporarily downgrade libjpeg-turbo.

An elog notice could be worthwhile though.


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]