[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gentoo-dev
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Old changelogs / eclass dir
From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic () gentoo ! org>
Date: 2011-10-31 21:52:00
Message-ID: 20111031160027.387b291e () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:39:39 +0000
Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 10/31/2011 05:45 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:46:30 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel"
> > <dilfridge@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> two small suggestions regarding ChangeLogs:
> >>
> >> 1) Why is there no ChangeLog in the eclass directory? In my
> >> personal opinion this is missing there, if only for historical
> >> reasons... Should we still start one?
> >>
> >> 2) I'd like to suggest that for changelogs that grow beyond a
> >> certain size (e.g. profiles/ChangeLog) the file is "rotated"
> >> similar to /var/log logfiles. I.e. the current file is renamed
> >> with a date extension and a new file is started. This has the
> >> benefit that the archived file is static and will never be
> >> retransmitted by rsync.
> >
> > I like both suggestions. Maybe we could split by year? That way
> > the old non-conforming entries would just go into the oldest log.
> > Delaying rotation by one year (ie. the first entry in 2012 would
> > cause entries in 2010 to be split off) would prevent getting a
> > bunch of empty changelogs Jan 1st.
> >
> >
> There is always the problem with abandoned (but working) packages
> which may have no commits in > 2 years. We'll end up with empty
> ChangeLogs.
notifempty
minsize 5k
--
fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense
toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime
@ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic