[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gentoo-dev
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RDEPENDing on packages from overlays?
From: William Hubbs <williamh () gentoo ! org>
Date: 2011-04-24 20:35:11
Message-ID: 20110424203511.GA24011 () linux1
[Download RAW message or body]
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:42:25AM +0300, Eray Aslan wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 07:39:55AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > I can live with that, as long as the responsibility that packages work
> > with dependencies from overlays stays entirely with the overlay's
> > maintainer.
>
> Good point. Agreed.
>
> > But could you please add a comment in the virtual's ebuild where (i.e.
> i> in which overlay) the additional dependencies can be found?
>
> Done.
Better yet,
why don't welook into moving those packages from the overlays into the
main tree?
William
[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic