[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in
From:       Dirkjan Ochtman <djc () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2011-03-29 17:50:18
Message-ID: AANLkTimwok6S0s9TXPwDtdQyGE-5=EEvTV=QZSAA12Nf () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 15:30, Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Why does anyone need to *add* a package that is maintainer-needed?

Regardless of how we might want to get rid of m-n packages, I do
wonder about who commits them, and why. For example, while looking
into the list of m-n packages, I also found
dev-python/remoteobjects-99999999, which was also entered into the
tree by vapier as m-n.

vapier, what's the rationale behind including these packages in the
tree? And if you need them, why can't you maintain them?

(I'm asking this as a member of the Python project, where we probably
wouldn't mind picking up some python m-n packages.)

Cheers,

Dirkjan

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic