[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting)
From:       Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2011-01-31 14:34:55
Message-ID: 20110131143454.GA27212 () comet ! mayo ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]


On 09:06 Mon 31 Jan     , Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 30-01-2011 20:31:24 -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > On 22:11 Fri 28 Jan     , Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> > > So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
> > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff
> > > 
> > > Please comment and help us improve the "english" of the whole document
> > > so it gets accepted :)
> > 
> > I think the question of whether a lead's decision can be revoked by a 
> > majority vote of the team should be a global Gentoo policy and not 
> > team-specific. I personally disagree that it should be possible, but 
> > that is a separate decision from whether it should be a common process 
> > across all of Gentoo.
> 
> I already think there's too much time wasted on bureaucratic stuff that
> distracts us from actually getting work done.

<grins>

I agree with not having a bunch of rules. But I think that when they do 
exist, they should at least be consistent.

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.com

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]