[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gentoo's plan to remove .la files: wording about when
From:       Diego Elio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Petten=F2?= <flameeyes () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-10-31 19:15:17
Message-ID: 1288552517.18073.48.camel () yamato ! local
[Download RAW message or body]

Il giorno dom, 31/10/2010 alle 20.09 +0100, Thomas Beierlein ha scritto:
> 
> If I read the discussion correctly we will still need to keep
> these .la
> files around.
> 
Most likely, yes… you can go a bit deeper about them (for instance
PulseAudio can load its plugins with libltdl even if the .la files are
not around, and the author _always_ recommended removing them), but
that's probably something we don't have to care about so much as it is.

For what concerns the list I provided, that's just the output of the
tinderbox in the case of hamlib, it was _Hamlib.la that triggered it, it
is installed in the Python tree and Python does not use .la files.

-- 
Diego Elio Pettenò — "Flameeyes"
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is,
it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]