[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/mpfc/files:
From:       "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2010-10-28 17:51:05
Message-ID: 4CC9B809.6000205 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


On 10/28/10 7:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>>> Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scrit=
to:
>>>>>> Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the
>>>>>> linux
>>>>>> headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in the patched .c file...
>>>>>
> the maintainer already has done his due diligence and reviewed the
> field.  at this point, it is *you* who disagrees with the situation
> thus it is *you* who needs to resolve *your* complaint.

Just curious: what are the technical reasons for that?

My understanding is that one header depends on another for proper
compilation but doesn't #include it. Is that correct?


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]