[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-qa] Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage to die on sure-enough
From:       Diego Elio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Petten=F2?= <flameeyes () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-09-28 22:35:03
Message-ID: 1285713303.13141.39.camel () yamato ! local
[Download RAW message or body]

Il giorno mar, 28/09/2010 alle 12.33 -0700, Alec Warner ha scritto:
> Its not clear to me what your purpose is.  It is likely that many
> developers will be unable to do 1.  Does that concern you?  Should
> developers ask QA for help on packages? 

Fixing the package is the solution, it's usually quick and easy to
identify; if you can bring up _any_ example of unfixable or
difficult-to-fix code, feel free.

I don't think that was not explained by me, I even wrote a whole blog
post about identifying, tracking down and fixing _FORTIFY_SOURCE
warnings.

-- 
Diego Elio Pettenò — "Flameeyes"
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is,
it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]