[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Two herds (and four extra?)
From:       Jeroen Roovers <jer () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2010-07-22 17:19:31
Message-ID: 20100722191931.164b76ce () epia ! jer-c2 ! orkz ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:13:44 -0400
"Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@gentoo.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 07/21/2010 12:11 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > = Alternative A = * first maintainer from the top down gets to be
> > assignee, * otherwise the first herd gets to be assignee.
> 
> Thanks for the info.  Just one point of clarification.  How does the
> "otherwise" work.  If we have herds listed before maintainers, do you
> still assign to the first maintainer?  In other words, do you only
> default to the first herd if there are no maintainers listed at all?

* "When metadata.xml lists a single maintainer or herd, then you assign
  the bug to that maintainer or herd. When the file lists multiple
  entries, then you assign the bug to the first maintainer, and CC the
  other maintainer(s) and herd(s). If you find that metadata.xml lists
  inappropriate and/or confusing contact information, then make a note
  of that in a comment on the bug report and assign/CC the bug report as
  optimal as possible."[1]


     jer


[1]
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/index.xml#doc_chap4_sect3

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]