[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-dev] Re: CAcert certificate distribution license to third parties (i.e. distributors like ge
From:       Daniel Black <dragonheart () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2010-06-27 1:02:54
Message-ID: 201006271102.59463.dragonheart () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


On Sunday 13 December 2009 22:44:05 Daniel Black wrote:
> Recently this got produced as a draft license for parties distributing
> CAcert's root certificate(s) (like us).
> 
> https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/Agreements/3PVDisclaimerAndLicence.h
> tml
> 
> This is still in draft hasn't been discussed in CAcert's policy group yet.
> 
> If you want to follow/contribute to this discussion look for a post to the
> policy list soon.
> https://lists.cacert.org/wws/info/cacert-policy
> 
> I make no inferences good or bad about this. Mainly because I'm writing
> this with a headache.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Daniel

Recently Sasha from Fedora has proposed CAcert's root distribution license as 
CC-ND. This avoids many complications of the draft proposal above.

By joining the list you can vote for it.

the proposal:
https://lists.cacert.org/wws/arc/cacert-policy/2010-06/msg00151.html

Once registered on this site there is a "send to (your email)" link on the top 
right to preserve threading.

ref: http://spreitzer.name/set-the-cacert-root-certificates-free

Daniel

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]