[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits
From:       Rémi Cardona <remi () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2010-04-27 19:11:17
Message-ID: 4BD736D5.9020201 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Le 24/04/2010 19:40, Petteri Räty a écrit :
> What do you think about not allowing commits to eclasses without
> mentioning an another developer who has reviewed and approved the diff
> in the commit message? There's enough people on gentoo-dev for urgent
> stuff too.

More bureaucracy and policies when we arguably have enough (or even too
much...?) My vote is a clear and resounding *no*.

If someone f*cks up, revert the commit if the issue isn't fixed quickly.

If that someone f*cks up again, call devrel on his ass.

If anything, we should be working on versionned eclasses rather than VCS
hooks.

My 2 euro cents.

Cheers,

Rémi

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]