[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Google Apps Standard Edition @ gentoo.org
From:       Sebastian Pipping <sping () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2010-03-31 23:49:15
Message-ID: 4BB3DF7B.1070808 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 04/01/10 01:09, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> no one is forcing you to, nor is anyone talking about having teams use it.  if 
> Gentoo developers themselves choose to, it's going to happen irregardless of 
> what Alec is proposing.

we are talking about public, shared work on gentoo - not about stuff
people do in private.


> your logic does not lead to the statement that gentoo-core is the appropriate 
> place.

point takes, it's not the non-technical nature - i should put it
clearer: it's the fact that everyone on the net will be able to read
what anyone said on google in this thread.  any one of us may change his
mind on that but the internet won't.
does that make it clear now why that thread belongs to gentoo-core to me?


> a bit ironic you espouse using open source software on fully controlled 
> systems in one half while suggesting people use the closed gentoo-core mailing 
> list in another ...

not every kind of open and closed are in contrast.  i don't see any
irony here.  the FSF is doing PR strategy stuff behind closed doors too,
what's the problem?



sebastian

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]