[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] On shebangs of scripts
From:       Mike Frysinger <vapier () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2009-09-26 12:09:17
Message-ID: 200909260809.18236.vapier () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


On Wednesday 23 September 2009 03:53:43 Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Should we start filing bugs on these issues?  In the end, they are
> broken scripts on the system.  Is there interest for porting the Prefix
> shebang QA check to normal Portage?

for the shell dependency issue, a review bug may be useful, but keep in mind 
nothing may change.  if a package installs examples for a bunch of shells and 
they're intended for end user use only, then it doesnt make sense to have that 
package depend on every shell that it installs helpers for.

for the other issues, there should be bugs and you should get those checks 
merged to portage proper.
-mike

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]