[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-08-22
From:       Jeremy Olexa <darkside () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2009-08-22 2:43:14
Message-ID: 4A8F5B42.50702 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> 
> Arrivals
> ========
> The third peport table on installed packages "most-unmasked" has just
> arrived:
> 
> http://smolt.hartwork.org:45678/static/stats/gentoo.html#installed_packages_most_unmasked
> 
> 
> Questions
> =========
> Before adding the forth "least-installed" table, I'd like to take the
> chance to ask for input from the treecleaner team, as it may be of most
>  interest to you in the future.

No need to add treecleaner to CC. I think we are all on this list anyway. ;)

> 
>  - Do you need anything that a dumb linear-with-counter approach
>    cannot offer?

Right now, I can't think of anything else actually.

> 
>  - Would zero-install packages be more interesting than
>    almost-zero ones or the other way around?

I don't really understand this question. Does "zero-install" mean that 
they are not installed at all? This isn't really useful, because the 
ommition of a package from the page can mean that no one has it 
installed. ;)

> 
> 
> What's next
> ===========
> Besides before-mentioned table the task
> 
>   Collect FEATURES variables in three sets (conf, defaults, globals),
>   not merged
>   http://soc.gentooexperimental.org/issues/show/58
> 
> is next on my list.
> 
> 
> 
> Sebastian
> 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]