[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] pet feature: mtime preservation (was
From:       Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2009-04-16 22:19:21
Message-ID: 20090416231921.794109fb () snowcone
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:15:46 +0200
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@gentoo.org> wrote:
> and from #gentoo-council:
> [do apr 9 2009] [22:41:47] <dberkholz> those of you with a pet
> feature, feel free to respond to the summary on -dev if you have some
> compelling reason why it's super easy to get in and can't be pushed
> back. keep in mind there's no reason we need to take forever for EAPI
> 4, either

Can we at least hold off on these until EAPI 3 is approved? I doubt
any of the many groups involved in EAPIs will be able to keep up with
the workload otherwise...

- -- 
Ciaran McCreesh
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAknnrusACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEZBgCffO/OlEDubIUdVyyOtJ73gwuW
+BQAoKz/D5u2ihDY9icN+ZOyQpoATFce
=jB6X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]