[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gtk-sharp-module.eclass
From:       Peter Alfredsen <loki_val () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2008-11-27 5:07:28
Message-ID: 200811270607.42421.loki_val () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


On Thursday 27 November 2008, Duncan wrote:

> In that case, it may be better to do the limited code duplication,
> given the relative permanence of eclasses.

So, what is it we're short of? Developer time or harddrive space? Is our 
problem that our packages start to bitrot or that we have huge number 
of bitrotting eclasses?
Just saying.

-- 
/PA

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]