[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for August 28 (today)
From:       Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2008-08-28 18:34:14
Message-ID: 20080828183414.GB6559 () comet
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/mixed)]


There's a council meeting in an hour and a half. Here's an agenda, it's 
all leftovers from last meeting.

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com

["20080828-agenda.txt" (text/plain)]

There are no new topics. EAPI 2 approval hasn't yet been requested.

Roll call
=========
betelgeuse 
dberkholz  
dertobi123 
flameeyes  
halcy0n    
jokey      
lu_zero    


Old topics
==========

Reactions to dev banned from freenode
-------------------------------------
Update: none. Assume lack of interest.


Moving meetings to a location we control
----------------------------------------
Update: none. Assume lack of interest.


Favor irc.gentoo.org alias in docs, etc
---------------------------------------
Update: Freenode acknowledgments page thanks people for doing this, so 
the potential issue with confusion apparently isn't a large problem.

Goal: Can we decide today?


Why aren't fired developers banned from the channels where they
displayed this behavior?
---------------------------------------------------------------
Update:

For banning from those channels: halcy0n, dertobi123 (on gentoo-dev)
No opinions from the rest of us

Goal: Get yes or no on banning from the same channels. If no, ask for 
alternate suggestions if there are any. (Example: let devrel decide)


PMS as a draft standard of EAPI 0
---------------------------------
What changes are required before this is true?

Update: The main thing that need to get figured out is conflict 
resolution.

Idea: Ask portage devs & PMS authors to develop a process that both 
groups will respect, then present it to the council for approval. 
Options include a "neutral" third party as PMS czar, having council 
decide, just trying harder to come to agreement, deciding that e.g. 
portage's choice always wins, random, etc.

[Attachment #6 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]