[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for August 7
From:       Robert Buchholz <rbu () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2008-08-19 18:35:23
Message-ID: 200808192035.28038.rbu () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


On Tuesday 19 August 2008, Mark Loeser wrote:
> I am not sure how we would be able to enforce this across the board
> for forcefully retired developers.

If we are talking policies, can someone please define the 
term 'forecefully retired'? What about people whom had been complained 
about to devrel, and who then resigned? Does it include people who are 
retired due to inactivity?

What benifit does this proposal have over an enforcement of the CoC on 
retired developers? If they choose to stay part of our community, any 
misbehaviour can also be penalized using that document. If they choose 
to stay and contribute properly, why ban them? I'm happy about all bugs 
I get, even by the most evil compile persons.


Robert

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]