[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=A0Re=3A?= [RFC] New policy:
From:       Mart Raudsepp <leio () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2008-07-28 1:18:07
Message-ID: 1217207887.2495.0.camel () localhost
[Download RAW message or body]


On P, 2008-07-27 at 18:20 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2008-07-26 02:56:24 Mart Raudsepp napisał(a):
> > On L, 2008-07-26 at 03:39 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > > Fortunately, the majority of ebuilds/packages are honoring LDFLAGS.  Of 
> > > course it's kinda difficult to always check if a package honors it or 
> > > not.  But it's a good idea to file a bug for every package that does not 
> > > honor it (without a reason).
> > 
> > I guess as many are using it to pass --hash-style=gnu in addition to
> > other things[1], an easy way to find out which don't honor it out of
> > your installed packages is to scan for ELF files that contain the .hash
> > ELF section in addition to .gnu.hash ELF section.
> 
> The QA check which verifies that LDFLAGS are respected is now in Portage
> trunk and will be released in 2.2_rc4. This check is enabled when LDFLAGS
> contain "--hash-style=gnu" and "${PN}" != *-bin. Other binary packages
> (e.g. net-www/netscape-flash) should set the QA_DT_HASH array/variable.
> 
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage?rev=11205&view=rev

You rock for actually putting this stuff to code!


-- 
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: leio@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]