[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-dev] =?utf-8?q?=C2=A0Re=3A_=5BRFC=5D_New_policy=3A_LDFLAGS_should_be?= respected
From:       Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-07-27 16:39:24
Message-ID: 200807271839.24347.Arfrever.FTA () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


2008-07-27 05:45:29 Jeremy Olexa napisał(a):
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > It will at least allow QA team to fix such bugs where patches are already
> > available.
> 
> So, if bugs are being fixed

Not all of them.

> Are bugs being ignored or RESOLVED, WONTFIX?

These bugs which aren't fixed are usually ignored.

> Hypothetically, if there was such a policy and there was 100's of bugs 
> filed with patches (maintainers should handle the patches anyway) this 
> isn't any different than the present lack of policy. Let us also pretend 
> that there were 100's of bugs filed that had no such patches 
> available..would the QA team have the manpower to generate patches to 
> fix this and apply them or would the bugs just rot in bugzilla and not 
> achieve anything?

Such bugs usually get fixed.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=regexp&short \
_desc=%28ignore%7Crespect%29.*LDFLAGS&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status \
=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED


-- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]